Tag Archives: literature

Celebrating Bloomsday

We’re really excited to be marking Bloomsday on Saturday with a special Beatroot Rendez-Vouz event at the Prince Albert in Stroud. For those of you who are justifiably wondering, “What the hell is Bloomsday?” — well, I’ll tell you.

Bloomsday is a celebration of James Joyce’s landmark novel Ulysses. The action of the novel takes place on one day: 16 June 1904, and closely follows the movements and thoughts of its primary and peripheral characters (many of them real Dubliners) on an ordinary day in Dublin. One of these primary characters is Leopold Bloom — hence the name”Bloomsday”.  The 16th of June was, in fact, the day Joyce met his wife-to-be, Nora Barnacle.

The novel caused a great uproar when it was first published, largely due to its stark depiction of the stuff of everyday life; including eating, drinking, pissing, shitting, daydreaming about sex, wanking, getting drunk and singing, getting drunk and crying, getting drunk and trying it on with the object of your desire, getting drunk and fighting in the street — namely, the things that real people do in real life.

Such offensive material was considered by the bulwarks of virtue to be obscene and damaging to society, and was therefore banned in the US and UK, until elderly men in black robes decided to acknowledge that Ulysses is a titan of modernist literature, and not just dimestore smut.

Every 16th of June since 1954, poets, authors, artists and punters who just love the book have marked Bloomsday in Dublin (and abroad) by following in the characters’ footsteps, drinking in the same pubs, eating the same sandwiches — possibly even using the same loos. Many follow the route the characters travelled in the book, between Sandymount (a seaside suburb of Dublin) and a meandering trail around the inner city.

For example, many people flock to Davey Byrne’s pub on South Anne Street at 11:30am to have a gorgonzola sandwich and a glass of burgundy — the very fare in the very same pub enjoyed by Leopold Bloom in the novel. Enthusiasts dressed in period attire will then read aloud from that chapter, often acting out the narrative.

Basically, it’s a bit of fun. I was lucky enough to be living in Dublin on the 100th anniversary of the day Ulysses takes place. It was like a much more sober — and more genuinely Irish — St Patrick’s Day. I’ve celebrated it ever since. This year, I’m chuffed that I’ll have some of my mates from Dublin here in Stroud to celebrate it with me.

Join the Facebook event here.

4 Comments

Filed under Gigs, Herons!

New Year Resolution: The End

by Benjamin Kritikos

A year ago, I made a resolution to read only women authors.  The thinking behind this act of positive discrimination was that I’d read far fewer books by women than by men, and I felt like I was missing out.  While I knew there were shitloads of excellent books written by women, I somehow managed to pass 30 years without reading very many.  The year 2010 was my chance to redress the imbalance.

Boy, am I glad I did.  I’ve spent a good deal of this past year catching up with the millions of people who read and loved the Harry Potter books — for which I was mercilessly teased by haters.  That always happens to great works that happen to garner popularity, though; even Ovid‘s Metamorphoses had its haters.

Of course, most people who actively voice a dislike for Harry Potter have never read the books, but only seen the films (or sometimes not even that).  I thought the films were rubbish — but hating on these books means you should pre-book a room in an old people’s home … No, I take that back.  Old people are not, generally, as embittered and old-at-heart as you; and we wouldn’t want to upset them.  Go read Ivanhoe or Dan Brown or whatever it is you like, and leave the rest of us alone.

Continue reading

5 Comments

Filed under New Year's Resolution, Women Authors

New Year Resolution: Part 5

by Ben Kritikos

A conversation is an interesting thing; it requires not only the ability to communicate, but also to listen, to empathise.  There’s nothing worse, more dispiriting, more of a pet peeve for me, than some one who can do the former — and in abundance — but not the latter.

Lots of great books, great as they are, have a bit of the epitaph about them.  Great male writers throughout the 19th and 20th centuries have struggled, suffered, written their heart-rending, world-shaking tomes and collapsed, moribund and fame-ready, into the great mausoleum of Literature.  Their works stand as stark reminders of their greatness, like 98 theses nailed to the door of a cathedral, or ten commandments engraved in stone by some almighty hand.

Finality.  When Ulysses talks, you listen.

I love those kinds of unanswerable books.  But not until recently did I realise how much I also love books for kids and young adults.  I love them both equally, and I believe they are equal.  Literature speaks to me with layer upon layer of the universal, in the language of the specific.  Books for young adults (the best ones) do the same thing — but slightly more fun.

*

The Secret Garden, by Frances Hodgson Burnett, is one of the best books I’ve ever read.  I loved it so much I periodically put it down, ran my fingers through my hair, took a deep breath and said, “Wow”.

Mary Lennox is a 10-year-old girl who is always ill in one way or another.  Everybody finds her most disagreeable.  She is sickly looking and bad-tempered.  When her parents die of cholera on their estate in India, she finds herself abandoned in the house, waiting crossly for some one to take notice.  She is discovered and sent to live with her reclusive uncle at Misslethwaite Manor in the Yorkshire moors.

No longer waited on hand and foot by servile natives, Mary’s life changes dramatically.  The wild, windy moors present a challenge to the spoiled, unhealthy girl, and she befriends a local boy named Dickon who can talk to animals.  Together they nurture a secret that slowly renews Mary’s health, and breathes new life into all at Misslethwaite Manor.

The Secret Garden does what a great book should: it puts you in sympathy with the emotional development of a character; it puts you in sympathy with their discovery of Nature; and it creates a lusciously magical world — partly of your own creation — into which you may step in and out, always taking a piece with you wherever you go.

It also had me considering taking a horticulture course.

*

I mentioned last time that Anna and I are reading the whole series of Harry Potter aloud to each other.  We are currently approaching the end of the fourth book, Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire.  Let me state for the record that I am now officially obsessed with the Harry Potter books.  J.K. Rowling is my new hero.

It’s funny, but when you tell people that you’re reading Harry Potter lots of them smile ironically, as though you told them Dan Brown was your favourite author.  I get the feeling that people have a different impression of the Harry Potter books than they deserve.

The first two books (Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone and Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets) seem tailored primarily for the 8-12 year old market, but that doesn’t mean there isn’t a serious depth and intelligence behind them.  The names of characters, imaginary places and incantations that accompany the many charms, hexes and curses all reveal a knowledge of Latin and the classics that testify to Rowling’s calibre as a writer.

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban and what I’ve read of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire are as adult, as dark and as challenging as anything else I’ve read in modern fiction.  They’re certainly better written — and definitely more intelligent — than The Da Vinci Code. The only thing that distinguishes the Harry Potter books from your average adult fiction is that all the main characters are children; and that while most popular fiction is mediocre, J.K. Rowling’s work is utterly, stupefyingly brilliant.

Books for young people are not, of necessity, sub-standard or second-class.  In fact, I’d go so far as to argue that, in many ways, and in many instances, young people are more discerning than us grown-ups — not least us bookish grown-ups.  Authors who know this approach their work accordingly.

I’d rather attend Hogwarts than Plato’s Academy.

*

I haven’t spent this whole time just reading fiction for young people, nice as that would be.  Thanks to my friend Jess, I’ve had the good fortune to read Zadie Smith’s brilliant first novel, White Teeth.

White Teeth is set in London, spanning time from the Second World War to New Year’s Eve of the year 2000.  Zadie Smith traces with razor-sharp wit and emotional cop-on the family lives of Archibald Jones, a hapless Joe Shmoe; and Samad Iqbal, a Bangladeshi immigrant struggling to keep his Islamic faith and cultural identity intact, and to keep his throbbing libido (and subsequent sense of guilt) under wraps.

Let me confess straight off the bat: the whole dissection of the immigrant mentality, and the multi-directional pulling of competing cultural identities really resonated with me and I was biased in its favour from the beginning.  As a first generation American, the issues Smith touches on are painfully familiar, and I’d never really thought about them in-depth before.

I suppose I’ve been too busy struggling with to-MAY-toes and to-MAH-toes, and learning to say sorry even when I don’t mean it.

But don’t let me give you the wrong impression; White Teeth is, above all else, funny, witty, incisive, and warming like a good cup of tea by the window on a rainy day.  Zadie Smith tells a wonderful story full of race-relations, gunpowder, salt fish and ackee, adultery and circumnavigations of the roundabout at Swiss Cottage; all with a vivid deftness that left me feeling acutely aware of myself as a social entity.  But in a good way.

Zadie Smith fits on the Ring Lardner end of the Holden Caulfield spectrum: she’s the kind of author I’d like to ring up on the phone for a chat.  In my world, where the young are always right in some very subtle and important way, that’s a huge compliment.

1 Comment

Filed under New Year's Resolution, Women Authors

Ben Kritikos’ New Year’s Resolution: righting a literary wrong

Anna is always taking the piss out of me. More often than not, it’s silly (“Did you see they put a picture of you in the Guardian?”Points to a drawing of an ape).  Every now and then, though, the joke is poignant.  And the truth is often told in jest, as funny lady over here never fails to remind me.

So it was that I discovered a gaping void in my knowledge of books.  I’m a reader, you see.  In school, when others were failing miserably and being moved to basement classes in “special ed.” because of bad behaviour or drug abuse, I was failing miserably and being moved into basement classes in “special ed.” because of Fyodor Dostoevsky.  I read the majority of Notes From Underground in Psychology class, secretly, the book hidden under the table.  Imagine the irony when I was caught; the teacher scolded me, saying, “You’re supposed to be learning about psychology!”

Dostoevsky, Checkhov, Bulgakov — I love them Russians!  My teens were spent writhing in the shadows of the Beat Generation, writing bad poetry entirely in lower case, dispensing with “and”, “the”, etc.  Salinger was my God; I’ve read The Catcher In The Rye 14 times, and Nine Stories (published in Britain as For Esmé, With Love And Squalor) ten times.  Rimbaud stole a week from my life which I’ll never recover, or even remember.  Henry Miller, Ernest Hemingway, George Orwell, Bruce Chatwin, and even D.H. Lawrence have been dearer fellows to me than most friends — and longer serving.

But female authors?  None.  I’ve barely read any.  Arundhati Roy’s The God Of Small Things, Stella Gibbons’ Cold Comfort Farm, and Harper Lee’s To Kill A Mockingbird are the only ones that I remember blowing me away … or remember at all, to be honest!  Shameful, I know.

Well, what are New Year’s Resolutions for?  This year, I’m going to plunge into the deep end and combat a long-standing error on my part.  I expect the results to be deeply, profoundly rewarding: I will only read female authors in 2010.  This, of course, excludes the Guardian, which I devour at lenght on Saturdays, and peruse during the week.  I will, however, be especially conscious of how much I enjoy Lucy Mangan’s columns.

Think of all the goodies I’ve been missing!  I have a few in my possession.  They’re a good start: An Ordinary Person’s Guide To Empire, by Arundhati Roy (starting in the comfort zone, so to speak); The Female Eunuch, by Germaine Greer; The Second Sex, by Simone De Beauvoir (you see, I’m doing a sort of penance for gender equality, and re-educating myself); The Color Purple, by Alice Walker; Nightingale Wood, by Stella Gibbons (as well as revisiting Cold Comfort Farm); as well as the works of female titans like Virginia Woolf, Gertrude Stein, The Brontës, et al.

Here’s the panic: can I go a year without re-reading my old favourites?  No Catcher or Nine Stories?  No Black Spring or The Time Of The Assassins?  No Season In Hell?  Oh my God, I’ve only read The Brothers Karamazov once!  And Ulysses twice — and I only sort of got it!  What about all those lesser-known Orwell novels I’ve been meaning to read, like Coming Up For Air or Keep The Aspidistra Flying?  For Christ’s sake, I’ve just been given a copy of Anna Karenina (loves me those Russians!), and I still haven’t read the copy of Middlesex my best friend gave me for my birthday in 2006!  How on earth will I manage?!

Be resolute!

I’ll keep you posted.

4 Comments

Filed under New Year's Resolution, Women Authors